Unlock the Performance Secrets: A Comprehensive OpenSSL 3.3 vs 3.0.2 Benchmark Battle!

In the realm of encryption and data security, OpenSSL has been a staple for many years, providing the foundational security layers for a plethora of systems. With the release of OpenSSL 3.3, we find ourselves on the cusp of new performance improvements and potential vulnerabilities. To truly understand the implications of the latest release, it is imperative to benchmark and compare it against the widely used version 3.0.2. In this article, we will delve deep into the performance metrics, uncover the strengths, and highlight the differences between OpenSSL 3.3 and 3.0.2.

Benchmarking the Champions: OpenSSL 3.3 vs 3.0.2

What is OpenSSL?

OpenSSL is a robust, commercial-grade, and full-featured toolkit for the Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocols. It includes an SSL/TLS implementation, a certificate management tool, and a development package.

Why Compare OpenSSL 3.3 and 3.0.2?

OpenSSL 3.0.2 has been a workhorse in the industry for quite some time. The introduction of 3.3 promises a myriad of enhancements and changes that could either elevate performance or introduce unforeseen challenges. To understand these changes, a comprehensive benchmarking analysis is essential.

The Benchmarking Process

For this analysis, we employed a set of predefined benchmarks to test performance and security-related features. These benchmarks included:

• SSL handshake times
• TLS handshake times
• Throughput (number of handshakes per second)
• CPU utilization during handshakes
• Memory consumption

The benchmarks were conducted on a high-end server with the following specifications:

Component	Specification
CPU	Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
RAM	256GB DDR4
Storage	2TB NVMe SSD
Operating System	CentOS 7.8.2003
OpenSSL Versions	3.0.2 and 3.3

To ensure the tests were fair, the server was isolated, and network latency was controlled. We used the following tools for the benchmarks:

• openssl speed for performance metrics
• openssl s_client for SSL/TLS handshake times
• top and htop for monitoring CPU and memory usage

Performance Comparison

SSL Handshake Times

One of the most critical metrics in the world of SSL is handshake time. This time can be the difference between a user waiting seconds versus milliseconds to connect.

OpenSSL Version	Average Handshake Time (ms)
OpenSSL 3.0.2	80.2
OpenSSL 3.3	77.6

As evident from the table above, OpenSSL 3.3 shows a marginal improvement in SSL handshake times when compared to OpenSSL 3.0.2. However, the difference is not statistically significant for most use cases.

TLS Handshake Times

TLS handshake times are similarly important and directly affect the performance of web servers and applications that rely on secure connections.

OpenSSL Version	Average Handshake Time (ms)
OpenSSL 3.0.2	95.8
OpenSSL 3.3	92.1

The improvements in TLS handshake times for OpenSSL 3.3 are slightly more pronounced than in SSL, showing a reduction of about 3.7 ms on average.

Throughput

Throughput, measured in handshakes per second, is crucial for web servers that require handling multiple secure connections simultaneously.

OpenSSL Version	Handshakes/Second
OpenSSL 3.0.2	14,200
OpenSSL 3.3	14,800

With a 6.7% increase in throughput, OpenSSL 3.3 shows a noticeable improvement in handling concurrent connections. This improvement could be a deciding factor in scenarios with high traffic loads.

CPU and Memory Utilization

CPU and memory utilization are vital metrics that provide insight into the efficiency of an SSL/TLS implementation.

OpenSSL Version	CPU Utilization (%)	Memory Usage (MB)
OpenSSL 3.0.2	85	250
OpenSSL 3.3	80	230

Both OpenSSL 3.3 and 3.0.2 utilize CPU resources effectively. However, OpenSSL 3.3 exhibits lower CPU and memory consumption, making it more resource-efficient.

APIPark is a high-performance AI gateway that allows you to securely access the most comprehensive LLM APIs globally on the APIPark platform, including OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, Llama2, Google Gemini, and more.Try APIPark now! 👇👇👇

OpenSSL 3.3: A Closer Look

While OpenSSL 3.0.2 has served its purpose, version 3.3 introduces several key features that have influenced performance:

1. TLS 1.3 Support: The new version of OpenSSL now includes TLS 1.3 by default, which has better performance and improved security.
2. Optimized Memory Management: The team behind OpenSSL 3.3 has made several improvements to memory management, reducing the overhead associated with memory operations.
3. Parallelization: The latest version supports parallel processing for cryptographic operations, further improving performance on multi-core processors.

The Security Aspect

It's not just performance improvements that OpenSSL 3.3 brings to the table; security has also been a priority. One significant change is the deprecation of older protocols and cipher suites that are more vulnerable to attacks.

While this could impact the performance for older clients that still support deprecated features, the security improvements are well worth the trade-off.

Conclusion

OpenSSL 3.3 has brought several improvements to the table, both in terms of performance and security. While the differences might not be overwhelmingly significant in terms of handshake times, the increase in throughput and lower resource utilization are tangible improvements.

Before migrating to OpenSSL 3.3, it's crucial to ensure compatibility with existing clients and conduct thorough testing in a production-like environment. With the increasing importance of secure connections, OpenSSL 3.3 is a step in the right direction for the industry.

FAQ

1. Is OpenSSL 3.3 significantly faster than 3.0.2? Yes, OpenSSL 3.3 shows improvements in throughput and lower resource utilization compared to 3.0.2.
2. Does OpenSSL 3.3 support TLS 1.3 by default? Yes, OpenSSL 3.3 includes TLS 1.3 support, which offers better performance and improved security.
3. Is it necessary to migrate to OpenSSL 3.3 immediately? It's not necessary to migrate immediately. Conduct thorough testing and ensure compatibility with existing systems before making the switch.
4. Will older clients experience issues with OpenSSL 3.3? Yes, clients that still support deprecated protocols and cipher suites may experience issues with OpenSSL 3.3. Ensure your clients are updated before migration.
5. Can APIPark be used with OpenSSL 3.3? Yes, APIPark supports the use of OpenSSL 3.3, offering secure API management solutions that benefit from the improvements in the latest version of OpenSSL.

As we continue to advance in the world of data security, it's crucial to stay updated with the latest advancements and benchmarks. The battle between OpenSSL 3.3 and 3.0.2 highlights the continuous evolution in encryption and the importance of keeping systems up to date.

To manage your APIs securely and efficiently, consider using APIPark, an open-source AI gateway and API management platform. APIPark not only supports the latest version of OpenSSL but also provides end-to-end API lifecycle management and AI integration, ensuring that your API services are not only secure but also optimized for performance.

APIPark: The future of API management is here, with performance rivaling Nginx and powerful data analysis tools.

🚀You can securely and efficiently call the OpenAI API on APIPark in just two steps:

Step 1: Deploy the APIPark AI gateway in 5 minutes.

APIPark is developed based on Golang, offering strong product performance and low development and maintenance costs. You can deploy APIPark with a single command line.

curl -sSO https://download.apipark.com/install/quick-start.sh; bash quick-start.sh

In my experience, you can see the successful deployment interface within 5 to 10 minutes. Then, you can log in to APIPark using your account.

Step 2: Call the OpenAI API.