By apipark —

Building an LLM Gateway Open Source: A Step-by-Step Guide

Building an LLM Gateway Open Source: A Step-by-Step Guide
LLM Gateway open source
XRoute.AI
XPack.AI

The landscape of artificial intelligence is evolving at an unprecedented pace, with Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4, Claude, and Llama 3 emerging as transformative technologies capable of revolutionizing everything from customer service to creative content generation. Businesses and developers are eager to integrate these powerful models into their applications, yet the direct integration often presents a myriad of challenges. From managing a growing number of diverse LLM APIs, handling rate limits, optimizing costs, ensuring data security, to maintaining consistent performance and observability, the complexities can quickly become overwhelming. This is where an LLM Gateway steps in, offering a crucial abstraction layer that simplifies interaction, enhances control, and scales operations.

An LLM Gateway is more than just a proxy; it's an intelligent intermediary designed to manage and optimize interactions with various LLM providers. It serves as a single entry point for all LLM-related requests, abstracting away the underlying complexities of different APIs and offering a unified interface. This centralized control not only streamlines development but also empowers organizations to implement crucial features like centralized authentication, sophisticated rate limiting, intelligent routing, cost tracking, and robust monitoring. Embracing an LLM Gateway open source approach further augments these benefits, providing unparalleled flexibility, transparency, and ownership, enabling organizations to tailor the solution precisely to their unique operational requirements and security postures. This guide will meticulously walk through the conceptual understanding, design principles, and a comprehensive step-by-step process for building your own LLM Gateway using open-source technologies, highlighting the immense value it brings to modern AI-driven architectures.

Understanding the LLM Gateway: The Essential Abstraction Layer for AI

In the burgeoning ecosystem of artificial intelligence, particularly with the explosive growth of Large Language Models (LLMs), developers and enterprises face a critical juncture. The promise of integrating advanced conversational AI, generative capabilities, and intelligent automation into applications is immense, but the practicalities often present significant hurdles. Directly interacting with multiple LLM providers, each with its unique API structure, authentication methods, rate limits, and pricing models, quickly leads to a tangled web of integrations. This complexity is precisely why an LLM Gateway has become an indispensable component in the modern AI infrastructure.

An LLM Gateway acts as a sophisticated reverse proxy specifically tailored for Large Language Models. It serves as a centralized point of entry for all requests intended for various LLM providers, abstracting the nuances of each underlying API. Instead of applications directly calling OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Gemini, or local open-source models, they interact solely with the gateway. This single point of contact provides a multitude of benefits, transforming what would otherwise be a chaotic and fragile system into a robust, manageable, and scalable one. Think of it as the air traffic controller for your AI models, directing requests efficiently and ensuring smooth operations across all your AI endpoints.

Why an LLM Gateway is Indispensable

The necessity for an LLM Gateway stems from several critical challenges encountered when integrating LLMs at scale:

  1. Unified Interface and Abstraction: Different LLM providers offer APIs with varying endpoint structures, request/response formats, and authentication mechanisms. Without a gateway, developers must write bespoke code for each provider, leading to code duplication, increased maintenance, and vendor lock-in. An LLM Gateway standardizes these interactions, presenting a single, consistent API to application developers, regardless of the underlying LLM. This significantly simplifies application logic and accelerates development cycles.
  2. Centralized Authentication and Security: Managing API keys, tokens, and access permissions for multiple LLM providers across various applications is a security nightmare. An LLM Gateway centralizes authentication and authorization. It can validate incoming requests using internal authentication mechanisms (e.g., JWTs, API keys specific to your gateway) and then securely manage and inject the appropriate provider-specific credentials before forwarding requests to the actual LLM. This reduces the attack surface and ensures sensitive API keys are never exposed directly to client applications.
  3. Rate Limiting and Quota Management: LLM providers impose strict rate limits to prevent abuse and ensure fair usage. Manually managing these limits in each application, especially across a distributed system, is error-prone. An LLM Gateway can enforce granular rate limits per user, per application, or per API key, preventing any single client from overwhelming the LLM provider or exceeding defined quotas. This also helps in optimizing costs by preventing runaway usage.
  4. Cost Optimization and Intelligent Routing: The pricing models for LLMs vary significantly between providers and even across different models from the same provider. An LLM Gateway can implement intelligent routing logic to direct requests to the most cost-effective LLM that meets performance and quality criteria. For instance, it can route less critical or lower-complexity requests to cheaper models or providers, reserving premium models for high-value interactions. It can also track token usage and associated costs in real-time, providing invaluable insights for budget management.
  5. Caching for Performance and Cost Savings: Many LLM queries, especially those for common prompts or frequently asked questions, might produce identical or very similar responses. Caching these responses at the gateway level can dramatically reduce latency and computational costs. If a cached response is available for a given prompt, the gateway can serve it directly without needing to call the external LLM, leading to faster user experiences and reduced API expenditure.
  6. Monitoring, Logging, and Observability: Understanding how LLMs are being used, their performance, error rates, and costs is crucial for operational excellence. An LLM Gateway provides a central point for collecting detailed logs and metrics for every request and response. This comprehensive telemetry enables proactive monitoring, rapid troubleshooting, performance analysis, and detailed cost attribution, offering unparalleled visibility into your AI operations.
  7. Resilience, Fallbacks, and Retries: External LLM APIs can experience transient errors, outages, or performance degradation. An LLM Gateway can implement robust retry mechanisms with exponential backoff, circuit breakers to prevent cascading failures, and fallback strategies. If one LLM provider is unavailable or performs poorly, the gateway can automatically route the request to an alternative provider, ensuring higher availability and a more resilient application.
  8. Prompt Management and Versioning: Effective prompt engineering is key to getting good results from LLMs. An LLM Gateway can serve as a repository for managing, versioning, and deploying prompts. This allows developers to iterate on prompts independently of application code, conduct A/B testing, and ensure consistent prompt usage across different services. It simplifies the process of updating prompts without requiring application redeployments.
  9. Data Masking and Compliance: For applications dealing with sensitive information, an LLM Gateway can perform data masking or redaction on inputs before they are sent to external LLMs and on outputs before they are returned to client applications. This helps in complying with data privacy regulations like GDPR or HIPAA by preventing Personally Identifiable Information (PII) from being processed or stored inappropriately by third-party models.

AI Gateway vs. LLM Gateway: A Clarification

It's important to distinguish between a general AI Gateway and an LLM Gateway. An AI Gateway is a broader concept that serves as a central management point for any AI service, whether it's an image recognition API, a speech-to-text service, a recommendation engine, or an LLM. It focuses on general API management principles applied to AI services.

An LLM Gateway is a specialized form of an AI Gateway, specifically optimized for the unique characteristics and requirements of Large Language Models. While it shares many foundational features with a general AI Gateway (like authentication, rate limiting, monitoring), it adds specific capabilities tailored for LLMs, such as:

  • Token-aware rate limiting and cost tracking: LLMs are often billed by tokens, not just requests.
  • Prompt management and versioning: Specific to how LLMs are interacted with.
  • Response stream handling: Many LLMs support streaming responses, which gateways need to manage efficiently.
  • Model-specific transformations: Handling the nuances of different LLM input/output formats.
  • Intelligent routing based on model capabilities and pricing: Optimizing for LLM-specific parameters.

Essentially, all LLM Gateways are AI Gateways, but not all AI Gateways are specifically optimized as LLM Gateways. For organizations heavily reliant on LLMs, a dedicated LLM Gateway offers deeper integration and optimization for this critical technology.

Benefits of an LLM Gateway Open Source Approach

While commercial LLM gateway solutions offer convenience, adopting an LLM Gateway open source approach brings a host of compelling advantages that can be particularly attractive for organizations prioritizing flexibility, control, transparency, and cost-effectiveness. This path empowers teams to build and maintain an AI infrastructure that is perfectly aligned with their unique strategic objectives and technical ecosystem.

  1. Unparalleled Flexibility and Customization: One of the most significant benefits of an open-source LLM Gateway is the ability to customize every aspect of its functionality. Unlike proprietary solutions where you're limited to the features provided by the vendor, an open-source gateway allows you to modify, extend, or remove components as needed. This means you can integrate it seamlessly with your existing monitoring systems, identity providers, internal data sources, or specialized routing algorithms. If you require a unique data masking strategy, support for a niche LLM, or a custom cost attribution model, you have the full power to implement it yourself. This level of adaptability ensures the gateway evolves precisely with your business and technical requirements, rather than forcing your operations to conform to a vendor's roadmap.
  2. Cost-Effectiveness and Reduced Vendor Lock-in: The immediate financial benefit of open source is the absence of licensing fees. While there are operational costs associated with development, deployment, and maintenance, these are typically internal and predictable, avoiding the escalating subscription costs often associated with commercial products, especially as your AI usage scales. Beyond direct savings, open source significantly reduces vendor lock-in. You're not tied to a single provider's technology stack, pricing structure, or feature set. This freedom allows you to switch LLM providers, integrate new models, or even migrate your entire AI infrastructure without disruptive vendor transitions, giving you immense strategic leverage.
  3. Transparency and Enhanced Security Audits: With open source, the entire codebase is transparently available for inspection. This offers a profound advantage for security. Your internal security teams can thoroughly audit the gateway's code, identify potential vulnerabilities, and verify that data handling practices comply with your organization's stringent security policies and regulatory requirements (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA, CCPA). This level of transparency is often impossible with closed-source solutions, where you must rely on vendor assurances. For sensitive AI workloads, knowing exactly how your data is being processed and secured within the gateway is invaluable.
  4. Community Support and Collaborative Innovation: The open-source ecosystem thrives on collaboration. When you build with open-source components, you gain access to a global community of developers who contribute to, use, and improve these tools. This means you can leverage existing libraries, learn from best practices, and often find solutions to common problems through forums, documentation, and community discussions. Furthermore, if you contribute back to the project, you become part of this innovative cycle, benefiting from collective intelligence and accelerating the development of robust, high-quality software that incorporates diverse perspectives and use cases. This collaborative spirit often leads to more resilient and feature-rich solutions over time.
  5. Full Control and Data Ownership: Deploying an open-source LLM Gateway means you retain complete control over your infrastructure and, critically, your data. Your requests and responses to LLMs pass through infrastructure that you manage, on servers that you own or lease. This is vital for organizations with strict data governance policies or those operating in regulated industries. You dictate where data resides, how it's logged, and who has access to it, mitigating concerns about third-party data retention or access policies. This level of ownership is paramount for maintaining privacy, confidentiality, and regulatory compliance.
  6. Deep Learning Opportunity and Skill Development: Engaging in the development and maintenance of an open-source LLM Gateway provides an invaluable learning experience for your engineering team. It fosters a deeper understanding of API design, distributed systems, network security, performance optimization, and the intricacies of LLM interactions. Teams gain hands-on experience with cutting-edge technologies and architectural patterns, leading to significant skill development and a more capable internal workforce. This investment in human capital translates into long-term benefits for the organization's technical prowess and innovation capacity.
  7. Faster Iteration and Adaptability: The LLM landscape is constantly evolving, with new models, APIs, and features emerging regularly. With an open-source gateway, your team can adapt much more quickly to these changes. Instead of waiting for a commercial vendor to update their product to support a new LLM or feature, you can integrate it directly. This agility allows your organization to rapidly experiment with the latest AI advancements, maintain a competitive edge, and ensure your applications always leverage the most effective models available.

Core Components of an LLM Gateway

Building a robust LLM Gateway open source solution requires a careful selection and integration of several critical components, each playing a distinct role in managing, optimizing, and securing your interactions with LLMs. Understanding these components is fundamental to designing an effective and scalable gateway.

  1. API Proxy/Router:
    • Role: This is the foundational element of the gateway, serving as the ingress point for all incoming requests from client applications. Its primary function is to receive requests, inspect them, determine the appropriate backend LLM provider or internal service, and forward the request. It also receives the response from the LLM and forwards it back to the client.
    • Implementation Considerations: Needs to be highly performant and handle a large volume of concurrent connections. It should support various HTTP methods and headers and potentially WebSocket connections for streaming responses from LLMs. It often involves URL rewriting and header manipulation. Modern choices include Nginx, Envoy Proxy, or custom-built solutions using frameworks like FastAPI (Python), Express.js (Node.js), or Gin (Go).
  2. Authentication & Authorization Module:
    • Role: Ensures that only authorized clients can access the LLM services through the gateway. It handles the validation of client credentials and determines what actions (e.g., which LLMs can be called) a client is permitted to perform.
    • Implementation Considerations:
      • Authentication: Supports API keys, OAuth 2.0, JWT (JSON Web Tokens), or integration with existing identity providers (e.g., Okta, Auth0).
      • Authorization: Implements Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) or Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC) to define granular permissions. This module will manage and validate credentials presented by the client and then inject the correct LLM provider API keys or tokens before forwarding the request.
  3. Rate Limiting & Quota Management Module:
    • Role: Controls the rate at which clients can send requests to prevent abuse, manage resource consumption, and comply with LLM provider limits. Quota management extends this to enforce daily, weekly, or monthly usage limits (e.g., total tokens consumed).
    • Implementation Considerations:
      • Algorithms: Common algorithms include token bucket, leaky bucket, and fixed window counters.
      • Storage: Requires a fast, distributed data store like Redis to maintain counters and ensure consistency across multiple gateway instances.
      • Granularity: Should support rate limiting by API key, user ID, IP address, or LLM endpoint. It's crucial for LLMs to track token usage, not just request counts.
  4. Caching Layer:
    • Role: Stores responses to frequently made LLM requests to reduce latency, decrease costs, and lessen the load on LLM providers.
    • Implementation Considerations:
      • Data Store: In-memory caches (e.g., Caffeine, in-process dictionaries), or distributed caches like Redis or Memcached. Redis is often preferred for its persistence, rich data structures, and distributed capabilities.
      • Cache Key: Usually generated from the prompt and model parameters.
      • Cache Invalidation: Time-to-Live (TTL) is common. More advanced strategies might involve explicit invalidation for dynamic prompts.
      • Considerations: Only cache non-sensitive, deterministic, and frequently repeated requests.
  5. Load Balancer/Intelligent Router:
    • Role: Distributes incoming requests across multiple instances of an LLM provider (if applicable) or, more importantly for LLM Gateways, across different LLM providers based on predefined rules, cost, performance, or availability.
    • Implementation Considerations:
      • Routing Logic: Round-robin, least connections, weighted round-robin. For LLMs, this becomes more "intelligent":
        • Cost-aware routing: Prioritize cheaper models/providers if performance/quality criteria are met.
        • Performance-aware routing: Route to faster models for latency-sensitive applications.
        • Capability-based routing: Direct requests to models best suited for specific tasks (e.g., code generation vs. creative writing).
        • Health Checks: Continuously monitor the status and performance of integrated LLMs to avoid routing requests to unhealthy endpoints.
  6. Monitoring & Logging System:
    • Role: Collects detailed metrics and logs for every request and response passing through the gateway. This provides crucial observability into performance, errors, usage patterns, and costs.
    • Implementation Considerations:
      • Metrics: Latency, error rates, request volume, token usage, cache hit/miss rates. Integrate with tools like Prometheus for collection and Grafana for visualization.
      • Logging: Detailed request/response payloads (with sensitive data masked), timestamps, client IDs, LLM provider, model used, cost incurred. Store logs in a centralized system like ELK stack (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana) or Splunk.
      • Alerting: Configure alerts for high error rates, rate limit breaches, or unexpected cost spikes.
  7. Configuration Management:
    • Role: Stores all operational parameters for the gateway, including LLM provider API keys, endpoint URLs, routing rules, rate limit policies, cache settings, and security configurations.
    • Implementation Considerations:
      • Secure Storage: Sensitive information (like API keys) must be encrypted at rest and accessed securely. Use environment variables, secret management services (e.g., HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, Kubernetes Secrets), or encrypted configuration files.
      • Dynamic Configuration: Ideally, configuration should be changeable without restarting the gateway, perhaps via a control plane or a configuration service (e.g., Consul, Etcd).
  8. Prompt Engineering & Management Module:
    • Role: Provides a centralized system for defining, storing, versioning, and templating prompts used with LLMs.
    • Implementation Considerations:
      • Storage: Database (SQL or NoSQL) to store prompt templates.
      • Versioning: Track changes to prompts over time, allowing for rollbacks and A/B testing.
      • Templating Engine: Allow for dynamic insertion of variables into prompts.
      • Interface: A user-friendly interface (admin dashboard) to manage prompts is highly beneficial.
  9. Response Transformation/Post-processing:
    • Role: Standardizes the output format from various LLM providers and can apply post-processing steps like data cleansing, content filtering, or reformatting before sending the response to the client.
    • Implementation Considerations: Define schemas for standardized responses. Use scripting or dedicated libraries for JSON/XML transformation. Implement content safety filters.
  10. Fallback & Retry Logic (Resilience):
    • Role: Enhances the reliability of LLM interactions by handling transient failures and outages.
    • Implementation Considerations:
      • Retries: Implement exponential backoff for retrying failed requests to the same or a different LLM.
      • Circuit Breakers: Prevent repeated calls to a failing LLM endpoint, allowing it time to recover (e.g., Hystrix-like patterns).
      • Fallbacks: Define alternative LLM providers or default responses to be used when the primary LLM fails or is unavailable.

These components, when meticulously designed and integrated, form the backbone of a powerful and efficient LLM Gateway open source solution, providing a solid foundation for managing complex AI interactions.

APIPark is a high-performance AI gateway that allows you to securely access the most comprehensive LLM APIs globally on the APIPark platform, including OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, Llama2, Google Gemini, and more.Try APIPark now! 👇👇👇
Install APIPark – it’s free

Step-by-Step Guide to Building an LLM Gateway Open Source

Building an LLM Gateway open source project is a significant undertaking that requires careful planning, iterative development, and a deep understanding of distributed systems and API management. This step-by-step guide will walk you through the entire process, from initial planning to advanced features and deployment.

Phase 1: Planning and Setup

The success of your LLM Gateway hinges on solid foundational planning. This phase focuses on defining your needs and setting up the technical environment.

  1. Define Requirements and Use Cases:
    • Start with "Why": What problems are you trying to solve? (e.g., too many LLM APIs, cost control, better security, unified logging).
    • Target LLMs: Which LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Hugging Face models, local models) do you need to support initially? Prioritize the most critical ones.
    • Key Features: List the minimum viable features. Must-haves often include: basic proxying, authentication, rate limiting, and basic logging. Nice-to-haves: caching, intelligent routing, prompt management.
    • Performance Goals: What is the expected throughput (requests per second)? What are the latency requirements? This will influence technology choices.
    • Security Requirements: What compliance standards (GDPR, HIPAA) must be met? How will API keys be managed?
    • Scalability Needs: How many users/applications will access the gateway? What's the anticipated growth?
  2. Choose Your Technology Stack:
    • Backend Framework (for the core proxy logic):
      • Python (FastAPI, Flask): Excellent for rapid development, rich ecosystem for AI/ML, good for prototyping and moderate loads. FastAPI is particularly well-suited for high-performance APIs with async support.
      • Node.js (Express.js, NestJS): Ideal for real-time applications and highly concurrent I/O operations due to its non-blocking nature. JavaScript ubiquity means easier full-stack development.
      • Go (Gin, Echo): Known for its performance, concurrency (goroutines), and static typing. Excellent for high-performance, low-latency services where resource efficiency is paramount.
      • Rust (Actix-web, Axum): Offers unparalleled performance and memory safety, but comes with a steeper learning curve. Best for extreme performance and reliability critical systems.
      • Recommendation: For a good balance of development speed, ecosystem, and performance, FastAPI (Python) or Gin (Go) are strong contenders. We will assume a Python/FastAPI-centric approach for illustrative purposes.
    • Database (for configuration, user data, prompt management, logs):
      • PostgreSQL: Robust, ACID-compliant relational database. Excellent for structured data, complex queries, and high data integrity.
      • MongoDB: NoSQL document database. Flexible schema, good for semi-structured data like detailed logs or prompt configurations.
      • Redis: Primarily a blazing-fast in-memory data store, crucial for caching, rate limiting counters, and session management. Not a primary database for persistent structured data, but indispensable for performance features.
      • Recommendation: PostgreSQL for core configurations and user data, combined with Redis for caching and rate limiting.
    • Monitoring & Logging:
      • Prometheus & Grafana: Industry-standard for metrics collection and visualization.
      • ELK Stack (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana): Powerful for centralized log aggregation and analysis.
      • OpenTelemetry: Emerging standard for unified observability (traces, metrics, logs).
    • Containerization:
      • Docker: Essential for packaging your application and its dependencies into isolated containers, ensuring consistent environments.
    • Orchestration (for production):
      • Kubernetes: For deploying, scaling, and managing containerized applications in production environments.
  3. Set Up Version Control (Git): Initialize a Git repository, establish branching strategies (e.g., GitFlow, GitHub Flow), and integrate with a platform like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket for collaborative development and code reviews.
  4. Initial Project Structure (Example using Python/FastAPI):llm-gateway/ ├── app/ │ ├── api/ │ │ ├── v1/ │ │ │ └── llm_proxy.py # Core proxy logic │ │ └── __init__.py │ ├── core/ │ │ ├── config.py # Application settings │ │ ├── security.py # Auth utilities │ │ ├── rate_limiter.py # Rate limiting implementation │ │ ├── cache.py # Caching utilities │ │ └── __init__.py │ ├── models/ │ │ ├── schemas.py # Pydantic models for requests/responses │ │ └── __init__.py │ ├── services/ │ │ ├── llm_provider.py # LLM provider specific logic │ │ └── __init__.py │ ├── db/ │ │ ├── database.py # DB connection │ │ ├── crud.py # CRUD operations │ │ ├── models.py # SQLAlchemy models │ │ └── __init__.py │ └── main.py # FastAPI application entry point ├── tests/ │ ├── test_api.py │ └── test_core.py ├── docker-compose.yml # For local development setup ├── Dockerfile # For building the application image ├── requirements.txt # Python dependencies ├── README.md └── .env.example

Phase 2: Core Proxy Functionality

This is where the gateway starts to come alive, handling the fundamental task of routing requests.

    • Objective: Implement a FastAPI endpoint that accepts incoming requests, identifies the target LLM provider, and forwards the request.
    • Implementation:
      • Define a generic /v1/chat/completions or /v1/generate endpoint.
      • Use an HTTP client library (e.g., httpx in Python for async requests) to make outgoing calls.
      • The request body needs to be transformed to match the target LLM's API. This often involves parsing JSON and restructuring it.
      • Handle streaming responses if the LLM provider supports it. FastAPI's StreamingResponse is excellent for this.
    • Objective: Decouple the proxy logic from specific LLM provider implementations.
    • Implementation: Create a services/llm_provider.py module with an abstract base class or interface. Each LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.) will have its own concrete implementation. The proxy logic then uses a factory pattern or a mapping to select the correct provider based on the request (e.g., model field in the request).
  1. Request/Response Transformation:
    • Objective: Ensure a consistent input format for the gateway and a consistent output format for the client, regardless of the underlying LLM.
    • Implementation: Use Pydantic models (in FastAPI) to define clear input schemas. Before forwarding, transform the gateway's internal request format to the specific LLM provider's format. Upon receiving a response from the LLM, transform it back into your standardized gateway output format. This could involve mapping field names, handling different message structures, or normalizing token counts.

Handling Different LLM APIs (Abstraction):```python

app/services/llm_provider.py (conceptual)

from abc import ABC, abstractmethodclass LLMProvider(ABC): @abstractmethod async def generate_response(self, model_name: str, prompt_data: dict, stream: bool = False): passclass OpenAIProvider(LLMProvider): async def generate_response(self, model_name: str, prompt_data: dict, stream: bool = False): # Specific OpenAI API call logic passclass AnthropicProvider(LLMProvider): async def generate_response(self, model_name: str, prompt_data: dict, stream: bool = False): # Specific Anthropic API call logic pass

In llm_proxy.py, you'd have a factory function:

def get_llm_provider(model_name: str) -> LLMProvider: if model_name.startswith("gpt"): return OpenAIProvider() elif model_name.startswith("claude"): return AnthropicProvider() else: raise ValueError("Unsupported model") ```

Basic Request Forwarding:```python

app/api/v1/llm_proxy.py (simplified)

from fastapi import APIRouter, Request, Response, HTTPException, status from fastapi.responses import StreamingResponse from httpx import AsyncClient import jsonrouter = APIRouter() llm_client = AsyncClient(timeout=60.0) # Configure a reasonable timeout@router.post("/chat/completions") async def proxy_chat_completions(request: Request): try: request_body = await request.json() # Determine LLM provider based on request_body.get("model") or some routing logic # For simplicity, let's assume it always targets OpenAI for now # In reality, this logic would be more complex and managed by services/llm_provider.py

    # Example: Transform request for OpenAI
    openai_url = "https://api.openai.com/v1/chat/completions"
    headers = {
        "Authorization": f"Bearer YOUR_OPENAI_API_KEY", # Get from config/secrets
        "Content-Type": "application/json"
    }

    # Forward the request, handle streaming if requested
    if request_body.get("stream"):
        async def stream_response():
            async with llm_client.stream(
                "POST", openai_url, headers=headers, json=request_body
            ) as response:
                response.raise_for_status()
                async for chunk in response.aiter_bytes():
                    yield chunk
        return StreamingResponse(stream_response(), media_type="text/event-stream")
    else:
        llm_response = await llm_client.post(openai_url, headers=headers, json=request_body)
        llm_response.raise_for_status()
        return Response(content=llm_response.content, media_type=llm_response.headers["content-type"])
except Exception as e:
    raise HTTPException(status_code=status.HTTP_500_INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR, detail=str(e))

```

Phase 3: Implementing Essential Gateway Features

Now, we integrate the core features that make an LLM Gateway truly powerful.

    • Objective: Secure the gateway from unauthorized access.
    • Implementation:
      • API Key Management: Create a database table (db/models.py) for ApiKey entities, associating them with users/applications and permissions.
      • Validation: Implement a dependency in FastAPI (app/core/security.py) that extracts an API key from request headers, validates it against the database, and injects user/application context into the request.
      • Provider API Keys: Store LLM provider API keys securely (e.g., in environment variables or a secret manager) and inject them into the httpx client before forwarding. Never expose provider keys directly to the client.
    • Objective: Control request volume per client/user to prevent abuse and manage costs.
    • Implementation:
      • Redis Backend: Use Redis to store counters for each API key (or user ID).
      • Algorithms: Implement a token bucket or fixed window algorithm. For LLMs, consider token-based rate limiting as well.
      • Middleware/Dependency: Create a FastAPI dependency (app/core/rate_limiter.py) that checks the current rate limit for the authenticated user before allowing the request to proceed. If exceeded, return a 429 Too Many Requests status.
    • Objective: Reduce latency and costs for repetitive LLM queries.
    • Implementation:
      • Redis Backend: Use Redis as the cache store.
      • Cache Key Generation: Create a unique key for each request based on the prompt, model, and other relevant parameters.
      • Logic: Before forwarding a request to an LLM, check if a response exists in the cache. If found and valid (not expired), return the cached response. Otherwise, forward the request, cache the LLM's response, and then return it.
      • TTL (Time-to-Live): Define appropriate expiration times for cached entries.
  1. Load Balancing & Intelligent Routing:
    • Objective: Distribute requests across multiple LLM instances/providers, optimize for cost or performance.
    • Implementation:
      • Configuration: Store details of available LLMs (provider, model name, base URL, pricing tiers, capabilities) in app/db/models.py or app/core/config.py.
      • Routing Strategy:
        • Simple (Round Robin/Weighted): Maintain a list of active LLM providers and rotate through them.
        • Intelligent: Implement logic in services/llm_provider.py to select the best LLM based on:
          • Cost: Query configuration for model pricing and pick the cheapest that meets criteria.
          • Latency/Performance: Track historical latency and choose the fastest available.
          • Capability: Route requests requiring specific capabilities (e.g., long context window, code generation) to appropriate models.
          • Health Checks: Periodically ping LLM providers to ensure they are responsive. Remove unhealthy ones from the routing pool.
  2. Monitoring & Logging:
    • Objective: Gain visibility into gateway operations, performance, and LLM usage.
    • Implementation:
      • Logging: Use Python's logging module. Configure structured logging (e.g., JSON format) for easy parsing by external systems like ELK. Log request details (user, model, input size), LLM response details (status, output size, token count), latency, and errors.
      • Metrics: Integrate prometheus_client to expose metrics from your FastAPI application. Track:
        • llm_gateway_requests_total: Counter for total requests.
        • llm_gateway_errors_total: Counter for error responses.
        • llm_gateway_request_duration_seconds: Histogram for request latency.
        • llm_gateway_token_usage_total: Counter for total tokens consumed.
        • llm_gateway_cache_hits_total, llm_gateway_cache_misses_total.
      • Deployment: Set up Prometheus to scrape metrics from your gateway and Grafana to visualize them with dashboards. For logs, use a tool like Filebeat/Fluentd to ship logs to Elasticsearch.

Caching:```python

app/core/cache.py (conceptual)

async def get_cached_response(cache_key: str): redis = aioredis.Redis(host='redis', port=6379, db=0) cached_data = await redis.get(cache_key) if cached_data: return json.loads(cached_data) return Noneasync def set_cached_response(cache_key: str, response_data: dict, ttl: int = 3600): # 1 hour redis = aioredis.Redis(host='redis', port=6379, db=0) await redis.setex(cache_key, ttl, json.dumps(response_data)) ```

Rate Limiting:```python

app/core/rate_limiter.py (conceptual using Redis)

from redis import asyncio as aioredis import timeasync def check_rate_limit(user_id: str, limit_per_minute: int = 60): redis = aioredis.Redis(host='redis', port=6379, db=0) # Get Redis client from config key = f"rate_limit:{user_id}" current_time = int(time.time()) window_start = current_time - 60 # 1 minute window

# Remove old entries and count current requests
await redis.zremrangebyscore(key, 0, window_start)
await redis.zadd(key, {str(current_time): current_time})
await redis.expire(key, 60) # Set expiry for the key

count = await redis.zcard(key)
if count > limit_per_minute:
    raise HTTPException(status_code=status.HTTP_429_TOO_MANY_REQUESTS, detail="Rate limit exceeded")

```

Authentication & Authorization:```python

app/core/security.py (simplified)

from fastapi import Security, HTTPException, status from fastapi.security import APIKeyHeader

... (Database lookup for API key)

api_key_header = APIKeyHeader(name="X-API-Key", auto_error=False)async def get_current_user_id(api_key: str = Security(api_key_header)): if not api_key: raise HTTPException(status_code=status.HTTP_401_UNAUTHORIZED, detail="API Key missing") # In a real app, look up API key in DB, validate, and return user ID/permissions # For demo, simple check: if api_key == "demo-api-key": return "demo_user" raise HTTPException(status_code=status.HTTP_403_FORBIDDEN, detail="Invalid API Key")

In llm_proxy.py:

@router.post("/chat/completions", dependencies=[Depends(get_current_user_id)])

```

Phase 4: Advanced Features and Enhancements

These features elevate your LLM Gateway open source solution from functional to truly robust and enterprise-ready.

  1. Prompt Management System:
    • Objective: Centralize, version, and manage LLM prompts.
    • Implementation:
      • Database Schema: Create a PromptTemplate table (db/models.py) with fields like name, version, template_string, variables (JSON), metadata, status (active/draft).
      • API Endpoints: Develop CRUD (Create, Read, Update, Delete) endpoints in FastAPI for managing these prompt templates.
      • Templating: When a client requests a prompt by name and version, the gateway retrieves the template, fills in dynamic variables (provided by the client), and sends the fully rendered prompt to the LLM. Use a templating library like Jinja2.
      • A/B Testing: Support routing to different prompt versions for A/B testing purposes based on client ID or other criteria.
  2. Fallback Mechanisms & Retries:
    • Objective: Improve system resilience against transient LLM provider failures.
    • Implementation:
      • Retries with Exponential Backoff: If an LLM request fails with a retryable error (e.g., 500, 503), implement a strategy to retry the request after increasing delays. The tenacity library in Python is excellent for this.
      • Circuit Breaker: Implement the circuit breaker pattern. If an LLM provider consistently fails (e.g., N consecutive errors), "open" the circuit to that provider for a period, preventing further requests. After a timeout, allow a few "test" requests to see if the provider has recovered. Libraries like pybreaker can assist.
      • Fallback Providers: If the primary LLM provider fails and cannot be recovered, route the request to a pre-configured secondary (fallback) LLM provider, even if it's slightly less optimal in terms of cost or quality.
  3. Data Security & Compliance (Masking/Redaction):
    • Objective: Protect sensitive data and comply with privacy regulations.
    • Implementation:
      • PII Detection: Integrate a PII (Personally Identifiable Information) detection library (e.g., presidio in Python) into the request and response processing pipeline.
      • Masking/Redaction: Before forwarding a request to an LLM, detect and mask/redact sensitive entities (names, emails, credit card numbers) from the prompt. Similarly, post-process LLM responses to mask any PII before returning to the client. This can be done by replacing sensitive data with placeholders (e.g., [PII_EMAIL]) or by removing it entirely.
      • Audit Trails: Ensure detailed logging captures all data transformations and masking actions, but never log unmasked sensitive data.
  4. Cost Optimization Strategies:
    • Objective: Minimize LLM expenditure without compromising critical application functionality.
    • Implementation:
      • Token Usage Tracking: Accurately track input and output tokens for every LLM call. This is crucial as most LLMs bill per token. Store this data in your logging/metrics system and database.
      • Dynamic Routing based on Pricing: Continuously update LLM pricing data. The intelligent router should consider real-time or near-real-time pricing when deciding which LLM to use.
      • Batching Requests: For less latency-sensitive tasks, allow clients to send multiple independent prompts in a single request. The gateway can then forward these as a batched request to the LLM (if supported) or process them concurrently and return a combined response, potentially reducing overhead.
      • Tiered Access: Offer different tiers of access for users/applications, with premium tiers having access to more expensive, higher-quality models, and basic tiers routed to cheaper, less performant alternatives.
  5. Web Interface/Admin Dashboard:
    • Objective: Provide a user-friendly way to manage the gateway.
    • Implementation:
      • Frontend Framework: Use a modern frontend framework like React, Vue, or Angular to build a Single Page Application (SPA).
      • Backend Endpoints: Develop additional FastAPI endpoints to serve the dashboard's data needs (e.g., list API keys, view logs, manage prompt templates, see usage statistics).
      • Features:
        • API Key Management (create, revoke, view usage).
        • LLM Provider Configuration (add/edit endpoints, credentials, pricing).
        • Prompt Template Management.
        • Real-time Usage Monitoring (graphs from Grafana).
        • Log Viewer (integration with Kibana/Elasticsearch).

Phase 5: Deployment and Maintenance

The final phase ensures your LLM Gateway open source solution is operational, scalable, and secure in a production environment.

    • Create a Dockerfile for your FastAPI application. This ensures your application and its Python dependencies are packaged into a consistent, isolated environment.
    • Use multi-stage builds for smaller image sizes.
    • Include CMD or ENTRYPOINT to run uvicorn (FastAPI's ASGI server) with appropriate workers.
  1. Orchestration (Kubernetes):
    • Objective: For high availability, scalability, and automated management in production.
    • Deployment: Create Kubernetes Deployment manifests for your gateway application, PostgreSQL, and Redis.
    • Services: Define Service objects to expose your gateway internally and externally.
    • Ingress: Use an Ingress controller (e.g., Nginx Ingress) for external access, SSL termination, and advanced routing.
    • Persistent Volumes: Use PersistentVolumeClaims for PostgreSQL and Redis data to ensure data persistence.
    • Secrets: Store sensitive information (LLM API keys, database credentials) using Kubernetes Secrets.
    • Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA): Configure HPA to automatically scale your gateway pods based on CPU utilization or custom metrics.
  2. CI/CD Pipelines:
    • Objective: Automate testing, building, and deployment.
    • Tools: Use GitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CD, Jenkins, or similar platforms.
    • Pipeline Steps:
      • Linting & Formatting: Ensure code quality.
      • Unit & Integration Tests: Run your test suite.
      • Build Docker Image: Tag and push to a container registry (e.g., Docker Hub, GCR, ECR).
      • Deploy to Staging: Automatically deploy to a staging environment for further testing.
      • Deploy to Production: Manual approval or automated rollout to production after successful staging tests.
  3. Security Audits & Updates:
    • Regular Audits: Conduct periodic security audits (both automated and manual) of your gateway's code and infrastructure.
    • Dependency Management: Regularly update all third-party libraries and dependencies to patch known vulnerabilities. Use tools like Dependabot.
    • Principle of Least Privilege: Ensure the gateway runs with minimum necessary permissions.
  4. Performance Testing:
    • Objective: Validate that the gateway meets performance requirements under load.
    • Tools: Use load testing tools like Locust, k6, JMeter, or Artillery.io to simulate high traffic and identify bottlenecks.
    • Optimization: Profile your application to identify CPU/memory intensive parts and optimize them. Tune database queries and caching strategies.

Containerization (Docker):```dockerfile

Dockerfile

FROM python:3.10-slim-buster as builder WORKDIR /app COPY requirements.txt . RUN pip install --no-cache-dir -r requirements.txtFROM python:3.10-slim-buster WORKDIR /app COPY --from=builder /usr/local/lib/python3.10/site-packages /usr/local/lib/python3.10/site-packages COPY . . CMD ["uvicorn", "app.main:app", "--host", "0.0.0.0", "--port", "8000", "--workers", "4"] ```

This comprehensive guide covers the spectrum of building an LLM Gateway open source solution. From initial design to advanced features and deployment, each phase brings you closer to a powerful, flexible, and fully controlled AI integration layer.

The Role of an AI Gateway in the Modern Enterprise: Beyond Building From Scratch

While the journey of building an LLM Gateway open source solution from scratch offers unparalleled control and customization, it is undeniably a significant undertaking. It demands substantial engineering resources, expertise in distributed systems, security, and ongoing maintenance. For many organizations, especially those looking to rapidly integrate AI capabilities without diverting core development efforts, leveraging an existing, robust AI Gateway or LLM-focused platform can be a more strategic and efficient path. These solutions often embody the very principles and features we've discussed for a custom-built gateway, but come pre-packaged, tested, and production-ready.

For instance, consider solutions like APIPark, an open-source AI Gateway and API management platform, designed to simplify the management, integration, and deployment of both AI and REST services. Such platforms offer a powerful alternative to ground-up development by providing a comprehensive suite of features out-of-the-box. APIPark, for example, excels in its ability to offer quick integration of over 100+ AI models, ensuring a unified management system for authentication and crucial cost tracking across diverse providers. This addresses the core problem of API proliferation that a custom LLM Gateway aims to solve, but with the added advantage of immediate deployment and established reliability.

A key benefit of platforms like APIPark is the unified API format for AI invocation. This standardizes the request data format across all AI models, meaning that changes in underlying AI models or prompts do not ripple through to affect the application or microservices. This significantly simplifies AI usage, reduces maintenance costs, and encapsulates a critical feature that would be painstakingly developed in a custom LLM Gateway open source project. Furthermore, APIPark empowers users to quickly combine AI models with custom prompts to create new, specialized APIs—such as sentiment analysis, translation, or data analysis APIs—effectively encapsulating sophisticated prompt engineering into simple RESTful endpoints.

Beyond LLM-specific features, a full-fledged AI Gateway like APIPark provides end-to-end API lifecycle management. This includes design, publication, invocation, and decommission, helping to regulate API management processes, manage traffic forwarding, load balancing, and versioning of published APIs. These are all critical aspects of any robust gateway, whether for LLMs or other services, but are provided as mature features within such a platform. For larger teams, APIPark also facilitates API service sharing within teams, enabling a centralized display of all API services, which promotes discovery and reuse across departments. Its support for independent API and access permissions for each tenant, along with API resource access requiring approval, demonstrates a strong focus on security and multi-tenancy—features that are complex to implement and maintain in a bespoke open-source build.

Moreover, operational concerns like performance, logging, and data analysis are inherently addressed. APIPark boasts performance rivaling Nginx, capable of over 20,000 TPS with modest hardware, supporting cluster deployment for large-scale traffic. It provides detailed API call logging, recording every aspect of each API invocation for rapid tracing and troubleshooting, alongside powerful data analysis tools that display long-term trends and performance changes for proactive maintenance. These are advanced capabilities that would take considerable effort to build, optimize, and maintain in a custom LLM Gateway open source project.

While the freedom of building everything yourself is appealing, commercial support and advanced features are often necessary for leading enterprises. APIPark, being open-source under Apache 2.0, caters to startups with its core offering, but also provides a commercial version for enterprises seeking advanced capabilities and professional technical support. Ultimately, platforms like APIPark provide a compelling proposition: a production-ready, feature-rich, and open-source foundation that streamlines AI integration and API management, allowing organizations to focus on their core business innovation rather than the intricate plumbing of their AI infrastructure.

Challenges and Considerations

Building an LLM Gateway open source project, despite its numerous benefits, comes with its own set of challenges and important considerations that teams must be prepared to address.

  1. Complexity of Diverse LLM APIs: The rapid evolution of LLMs means new models and providers emerge constantly, each with unique API specifications, nuances in input/output formats, and specific requirements (e.g., different ways to handle system messages, tool calls, or streaming). Maintaining compatibility and continuously updating the gateway to support these diverse and changing interfaces is a significant ongoing engineering effort. The abstraction layer needs to be flexible enough to handle these variations without constant re-architecting.
  2. Maintaining Security: The gateway is a critical control point for all LLM interactions, making it a prime target for attacks. Securing the gateway involves not just robust authentication and authorization, but also diligent management of LLM provider API keys, protection against injection attacks (especially given prompt templating), careful data masking for PII, and continuous vulnerability scanning. Any compromise could expose sensitive data or lead to unauthorized LLM usage and high costs. The transparency of open source helps, but the responsibility for security falls entirely on the implementing team.
  3. Scalability and Performance: An LLM Gateway must be able to handle potentially very high volumes of concurrent requests, especially for interactive AI applications. This requires careful design of the underlying architecture (e.g., asynchronous programming, efficient HTTP clients), proper load balancing, and optimization of every component, from database interactions to caching mechanisms. Ensuring low latency while managing heavy traffic across potentially slow or distant LLM providers is a constant challenge. Distributed systems add their own layer of operational complexity.
  4. Data Privacy and Compliance: Handling data that flows through an LLM Gateway requires strict adherence to privacy regulations (e.g., GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA). This includes ensuring data encryption in transit and at rest, implementing data retention policies, accurately performing PII masking/redaction, and providing audit trails. The gateway acts as a data processor, and any misstep can lead to severe legal and reputational consequences. Organizations must have a clear strategy for how data is handled and where it resides.
  5. Evolving LLM Landscape: The field of LLMs is characterized by rapid innovation. New capabilities (e.g., function calling, multimodal inputs), improved models, and changes in best practices are frequent. An open-source gateway needs a dedicated team to constantly monitor these developments, evaluate new models, and integrate relevant features. Failing to keep up could mean the gateway becomes a bottleneck or prevents the adoption of more advanced, cost-effective, or performant LLMs.
  6. Resource Allocation for Ongoing Development and Maintenance: While open source eliminates licensing fees, it necessitates internal investment in development, testing, deployment, and ongoing maintenance. This includes patching security vulnerabilities, upgrading dependencies, adding new features, troubleshooting issues, and optimizing performance. Organizations must accurately assess the total cost of ownership, including the salaries of the engineering team dedicated to this project, and ensure these resources are consistently available. Neglecting maintenance can lead to an outdated, insecure, and unreliable system.
  7. Cost Tracking Accuracy: While the gateway enables cost optimization, accurately tracking token usage and translating it into actual monetary cost across various LLM providers with different pricing structures (input tokens vs. output tokens, per-model variations) can be complex. The gateway needs sophisticated logic to aggregate this data and present it in a meaningful way for financial reporting and budget management.

Addressing these challenges requires a mature engineering culture, robust processes, and a clear understanding of the trade-offs between building a custom solution and adopting an existing platform.

Conclusion

The journey of building an LLM Gateway open source solution is a testament to the power of thoughtful architecture and strategic engineering in the rapidly evolving world of artificial intelligence. As Large Language Models become increasingly integral to enterprise applications, the complexities of managing diverse APIs, ensuring security, optimizing costs, and maintaining performance can quickly overwhelm development teams. An LLM Gateway, therefore, emerges not as a luxury, but as an essential piece of modern AI infrastructure, acting as an intelligent intermediary that harmonizes chaotic integrations into a streamlined, resilient, and scalable system.

Through this comprehensive guide, we've explored the fundamental necessity of an LLM Gateway, delving into its core components—from the basic API proxy and robust authentication to sophisticated rate limiting, caching, intelligent routing, and meticulous monitoring. We've outlined a step-by-step process for constructing such a gateway, emphasizing the crucial planning phases, the implementation of core and advanced features, and the indispensable considerations for deployment and ongoing maintenance. The decision to embrace an LLM Gateway open source approach further empowers organizations with unparalleled flexibility, transparency, and ownership, enabling them to sculpt an AI infrastructure precisely tailored to their unique operational demands and strategic vision.

While the rewards of a custom-built, open-source gateway are significant, including deep control and cost efficiency, it's also clear that this path demands substantial commitment in terms of engineering resources and expertise. For those seeking immediate productivity and a pre-packaged, production-ready solution that embodies these principles, platforms like APIPark offer a compelling alternative. These dedicated AI gateways provide rapid integration, unified API management, prompt encapsulation, and robust lifecycle management, demonstrating how a mature, open-source product can solve many of the same complex challenges without the overhead of building every component from scratch.

Ultimately, whether you choose to build your own LLM Gateway open source solution or leverage an existing AI Gateway, the underlying principle remains the same: an intelligent abstraction layer is critical for navigating the dynamic LLM landscape. It transforms the daunting task of integrating powerful AI models into a manageable, secure, and cost-effective endeavor, paving the way for innovation and ensuring that your organization can harness the full transformative potential of artificial intelligence with confidence and control. The future of AI is not just about the models themselves, but about the intelligent infrastructure that empowers their responsible and efficient deployment.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

1. What is an LLM Gateway and why is it important for businesses? An LLM Gateway is an intelligent proxy that acts as a centralized entry point for all requests to various Large Language Model (LLM) providers. It's crucial for businesses because it simplifies LLM integration, centralizes security (authentication, API key management), enforces rate limits, optimizes costs through intelligent routing and caching, provides comprehensive monitoring, and improves resilience with fallbacks. This reduces development complexity, enhances control, and ensures scalable, secure, and cost-efficient AI operations.

2. What are the main benefits of choosing an "LLM Gateway open source" approach over a commercial solution? The "LLM Gateway open source" approach offers superior flexibility and customization, allowing organizations to tailor the gateway precisely to their specific needs. It eliminates licensing fees, reducing vendor lock-in and offering greater cost-effectiveness over the long term. Open source also provides full transparency for security audits, complete control over data, and access to a vibrant community for support and collaborative innovation. While it requires internal development resources, it provides unparalleled ownership and adaptability.

3. What are the essential features to include when building an LLM Gateway? Key features include: * API Proxy/Router: Forwards requests to target LLMs. * Authentication & Authorization: Secures access to the gateway. * Rate Limiting & Quota Management: Controls request volume and token usage. * Caching: Improves performance and reduces costs for repetitive queries. * Intelligent Routing: Directs requests to optimal LLMs based on cost, performance, or capability. * Monitoring & Logging: Provides observability into usage, errors, and costs. * Prompt Management: Centralizes and versions prompt templates. * Fallback & Retry Logic: Enhances resilience against LLM provider failures.

4. How does an LLM Gateway help with cost optimization? An LLM Gateway optimizes costs in several ways: * Intelligent Routing: It can direct requests to the most cost-effective LLM provider or model based on real-time pricing and task requirements. * Caching: By serving cached responses for repeated queries, it reduces the number of calls to expensive external LLMs. * Rate Limiting & Quota Management: Prevents excessive or unauthorized usage that could lead to unexpected bills. * Detailed Cost Tracking: Provides granular visibility into token usage and spending, enabling better budget management and allocation.

5. What are some significant challenges when building an LLM Gateway from scratch? Building an LLM Gateway involves several challenges: * Evolving LLM Landscape: Constantly adapting to new LLM models, APIs, and features from various providers. * Security: Ensuring robust authentication, protecting sensitive API keys, and implementing data masking for privacy. * Scalability & Performance: Designing for high throughput and low latency under heavy load. * Data Privacy & Compliance: Adhering to strict data regulations during processing and storage. * Resource Allocation: Committing dedicated engineering resources for initial development, ongoing maintenance, and updates.

🚀You can securely and efficiently call the OpenAI API on APIPark in just two steps:

Step 1: Deploy the APIPark AI gateway in 5 minutes.

APIPark is developed based on Golang, offering strong product performance and low development and maintenance costs. You can deploy APIPark with a single command line.

curl -sSO https://download.apipark.com/install/quick-start.sh; bash quick-start.sh
APIPark Command Installation Process

In my experience, you can see the successful deployment interface within 5 to 10 minutes. Then, you can log in to APIPark using your account.

APIPark System Interface 01

Step 2: Call the OpenAI API.

APIPark System Interface 02
Install APIPark – it’s free
Article Summary Image
Previous

APIM Service Discovery: Streamline Your API Management

 Next

Fix 'proxy/http: failed to read response from v2ray'